New participants include Phoenix Ancient Art (antiquities from the 6th century B.C. to 14th century A.D.); and CRAWFORD (Contemporary silver), from Fairfield Ct.; and for the devoted Downton Abbey stalwarts there's Reville & Rossiter (Downton Abbey-style English silver, Cartier and rare jewels, period costume and paste jewelry); Southampton-based Hollis Reh & Shariff (Fine and estate jewelry).

The Spring Show NYC is a vetted show—every item in each booth is examined by panels of experts for authenticity. The panels also ensure that comprehensive, accurate labeling is attached to every piece. Vetted shows are the standard for all quality art and antiques fairs. The AADLA Spring Show Opening Night, by-invitation-only Preview Party will be on Wednesday, May 1. Sponsored by 1stdibs.com, the premier online marketplace for purveyors for luxury goods, and the Manhattan Art and Antique Center, the Preview will benefit the ASPCA® (The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals).

This year’s Honorary Co-chairs include Amy Fine Collins, Somers and Jonathan Farkas and Carolyne Roehm. The Connoisseur Committee Co-chairs are Brett Beldock, Michael Bruno, Mario Buatta, Dara Caponigro, David Patrick Columbia, Robert Couturier, Celerie Kemble, Edward Lobrano, Brian McCarthy, Miles Redd, Ellen and Chuck Scarborough, Michael Smith, Bunny Williams and Vicente Wolf. Park Avenue Armory May 1 - 5.

In a d new documentary, “Smyrna: The Destruction of a Cosmopolitan City, 1900-1922” Maria Iliou draws a magnifying glass over this Anatolian city’s glorious and tragic period. Through the creative use of archival photographs, snippets of black and white film, and illuminating narration by several historians, Smyrna’s vibrant, exotic personality erupts. Hunched on the crossroads of the East and West, prosperous Greeks dominated the eclectic population that included Armenians, Sephardic Jews, Muslims, and Levantines—wealthy European families. A truly multi-cultural city, photographs depict residents in national costumes strolling side-by side.

But this utopian strip of time was disrupted by rising Ottoman nationalism, the Balkan Wars and World War I. For many Greeks whose roots extend to Smyrna, the violent expulsion of the Greek community in 1922 echoes to this day.

Peppered with historical facts that form an intriguing chain link of inevitable social and political events, the well-crafted documentary is effectively scored by Nikos Platyrachos. World politics break in on this corner of the world after World War I. A fascinating passage describes Greece’s Prime Minister Eleftherios Venizelos and his “big idea” bent on re-possessing all ancient Greek lands. A wildly ambitious venture, after World War I, when the Allied Powers met to decide how national boundaries would be re-drawn, he proved a spell-binding orator, convincing the Western leaders to let Greece occupy Smyrna.

That’s when Greece won the battle but lost the war. At the same time, an exceptional warrior and leader rose from the Turkish ranks, Mustafa Kemal (Ataturk) who was determined to unify the Ottoman lands and rid them of “foreigners.” In the end, the city ignites—flames consume the past demolishing a beautiful idea.
Quad Cinema April 5 - 18.

EYE ON THE ARTS, NY -- Celia Ipiotis

The film Hyde Park On Hudson directed by Roger Michell and written by Richard Nelson glows with the era’s newly minted sense of American might and dusty view of English royalty.

Determined to acquire support for the Allies, King George (Samuel West), who suffers from a debilitating stammer and his wife, the stuffy Queen Elizabeth (Olivia Colman) are unprepared for the lack of formality proffered by the brash Americans. But if this film drawn in-part from President Roosevelt’s cousin’s diaries is to be believed, Roosevelt won King George’s admiration and friendship through his wit and sharp intellect. In exchange, Roosevelt recognized he could partner with King George when America did champion the war effort.

Bright light sears the grounds that roll from green lawns to fields of wild flowers. Intent on feeling a physical freedom lost to him on a daily basis, Roosevelt thrills in driving his snappy car as fast as possible over the country roads and taking long swims on the vast grounds.

His friendship and subsequent amorous relationship with his cousin Daisy (Laura Linney), forms the heart of the film. Around that love extends the story of a determined man, one who understood how to control images of himself and his staff, at a time when journalists could be managed and counted on to “do the right thing.” In the lead role, Bill Murray forms a credible portrait of an intellectually robust president with an acute sense of humor and love of all things beautiful. Although Cousin Daisy is a straight-backed practical albeit kind woman, Linney extracts an intoxicating light from inside her.

An immensely appealing movie, this is a wonderful slice of America on the cusp of a changing world order.

Available to Home Market. EYE ON THE ARTS, NY -- Celia Ipiotis

In a childhood mishap, Webb broke his back arresting his growth and forming a hump. Fortunately, a doctor suggested he play drums to build upper body strength. This sensitive young boy grew up to be the man everyone wanted to emulate or battle during his famed tenure at the Savoy Ballroom.

Intrigued by the era after reading a paragraph about Chick Webb in a jazz biography, Jeff Kaufman spent seven years researching and shooting his 90 minute documentary “The Savoy King: Chick Webb & The Music That Changed America.” Archival film footage and photographs trace the mighty rise of Harlem as the center of American culture before WWII.

The story is told through the visuals, plus a handful of animated interviews with a major American swing dancer and choreographer Frankie Manning, along with another ageless dancer, Norma Miller. Visions of the era are plumped up by John Issacs a star of the NY Rens all-black professional basketball team.

A host of celebrity voices – Kareem Abdul-Jabbar, Billy Crystal, Bill Cosby, Andy Garcia, Danny Glover, Janet Jackson, John Legend, Charlie Watts a host of others--speak the words of the era’s monumental jazz artists.

Known for his sensitively shaded, and driving drumming style, Web was dedicated to making the best music possible. Much of his income paid for top-of-the line band arrangements. Rehearsals ran through the night until the crack of dawn and band members were held to the highest standards.

When one of jazz’s greatest voices, Ella Fitzgerald came out at the Apollo at 15 she was booed until she sang A cappella. A young, awkward, teenage girl with an unassailable talent, Webb adopted Fitzgerald and guided her careeer.

Although many might know about the inequities facing “colored” artists-- unable to share white-only designated food, entertainment, boarding and transportation facilities--fewer people know that the Savoy Club was the first nightspot to open its doors to everyone, regardless of race. A white owner and a black manager turned the club into the volcanic cultural center of Harlem.

Of course, it’s impossible to describe the swing era without paying homage to the dancers. They drove the musicians and drew the crowds. To see the dance footage stands as a reminder that their inventiveness and athleticism has never been equaled, not even by today’s polished hip hop dancers.

Anyone interested in the roots of American musical culture and popular dance will prize this film.

Available to Home Market.

(Additional resources: Frankie Manning recalls his memorable days as a dancer at the Savoy in an interview with Celia Ipiotis. Includes clips of the Harlem Clubs and musicians)
EYE ON DANCE Archive Program Series #251
Click Here
EYE ON THE ARTS, NY -- Celia Ipiotis

Long shots dominate the film, framing gloriously lush green hills shaped like voluptuous back-ends and thighs, fast running brooks, caves dripping icy fresh water, sheets of rocks and herd of sheep. Director of photography, Inti Briones, holds the long shoots on the visual canvas, allowing the figures to move in one corner of the frame and grow larger as they move forward or slip out of the sides.

These broad views smack into extreme close-ups, zeroing in on a flashlight spotting a face, hands wrapped around shoulders and parts of limbs usually in physical or sexual motion. Throughout the film, the engaged couple, Gael Garcia Bernal (Alex) and Hani Furstenberg (Nica) exhibit an enthusiastic appetite for outdoor sports and sex.

With the exception of some songs around the campfire, and sounds of nature, the sound of feet on all different surfaces form the film’s score. Their guide, the amusing Bidzina Gujabidze (Dato) is a confident guide, who can do magic with string while protecting his youthful clients.

At one point, the trio is approached by a few mountaineers, carrying a ferocious looking rifle that ends up in Nical’s forehead. His reaction at this point radically changes the metabolism of the film and the way Alex relates to Nica.

A gorgeous mediation of the Georgian countryside, the film enjoys three fine performances and a film that doesn’t fully delve into some rich interpersonal material. Maybe that wasn’t the intent—if not, it still needs some editing and shaping.
Originally a New York Film Festival Selection in 2011, released nationally to home market.
EYE ON THE ARTS, NY -- Celia Ipiotis

Let’s tip off with a question that may not have an immediate or easy answer: Which movie better empowers black audiences? An historic drama, more or less factually-based, in which white men argue over and eventually move towards ending slavery – if not racism? Or an historic fantasy, rife with vulgarity, anachronism and impropriety, in which a freed black slave lays waste to every white southerner impeding his reunion with his wife — and gets away with it?

I am not asking which is the better movie, Lincoln or Django Unchained. Both have their problems. But it’s possible, despite their flaws, to enjoy them both for what they are, while accepting what they are not. I did not expect Lincoln to be much different from any other Steven Spielberg movie (though, until the ending, it is) and I certainly didn’t expect Django to be anything other than a Quentin Tarantino movie (and it is, only more so, for better and worse.)

For whatever it’s worth, my issues with the movie have more to do with craft than substance. I think Django talks too much, even for a Tarantino movie; and I also think that many of its scenes go on for too long, almost as if the movie’s afraid to let go of whatever effect it thinks it’s making with those people in the dark. It occurs to me, as well, that Tarantino’s been ripping himself off too cavalierly. I watch the set-pieces of wholesale slaughter and think, if I didn’t know any better, I’d swear I was watching Kill Bill Vol. 1 and the Japanese have been turned into southern whites.

Still, I couldn’t help myself. I laughed at Don Johnson and his night-riding stooges throwing hissy fits over whether to keep their masks on. I was almost touched by the slave girl’s impromptu bon mot aimed at Django’s baby-blue fop’s outfit. “You’re free…and you want to dress like that?” I didn’t buy any of it. But I was into it. And part of me hates myself for it. But I’m not sorry I saw it.

All right, then. So what am I asking? Get comfortable. I’m going to digress.

Back in 2006, I reviewed Blood Diamond for Newsday, giving it the two stars I routinely doled out to generic Hollywood mediocrity. I acknowledged the importance of the movie’s theme, which was the exploitation and wholesale murder of black Africans for the sake of the pink diamond trade. But I found myself chafing over the way this movie, along with so many of its kind, depicted its dark-skinned characters “as wholesale cannon fodder, doomed-but-noble ciphers or sneering bloodthirsty sociopaths.” I also lamented how the always-exemplary Djimon Hounsou, cast as a fisherman from Sierra Leone searching for his captured son, was used mainly as a vehicle through which the morally indolent white mercenary played by Leonardo DiCaprio Finds His Humanity (or something like that). At one point, Hounsou’s character even wonders aloud whether his people’s black skin constitutes some sort of curse “and [that] we were better off when the white man ruled.” No one, certainly not DiCaprio’s character, bothers to engage, much less contradict, this query. And, of the movie’s critics, I recall only the Nation’s Stuart Klawans calling the movie on this odious hogwash.

This is how I ended my own review:

“I suppose we should be grateful that there have been so many commercial features in recent years (“Hotel Rwanda,” “The Constant Gardener” among them) that pay attention to Africa’s woes. But even the best of them seem to writhe from hopelessness to despair and back again. Maybe what the continent needs are some empowering pulp myths far beyond the hoary model of Tarzan. A good start would be to cast Hounsou as the lead in a movie about the Black Panther, Marvel Comics’ first superhero-of-color. An African king who’s both a world-class physicist and a supreme martial artist may not be plausible, but he could broaden moviegoers’ sense of what’s possible.” (ITALICS ADDED).

Some readers, at least those who got that far, seemed to have a problem with this notion. One used the word, “infantile (which over time I’ve accepted as a back-handed compliment). But what is so childish about African American audiences wanting their on-screen counterparts (or surrogates) to be more than merely victims? I believe even white audiences get excited when conventional expectations, especially in race and cultural matters, are upended, if not exactly transcended.

This is the excitement I hear from people after they’d just seen Django Unchained. I doubt whether any of these viewers bought their tickets with the expectation of seeing some historically faithful saga of antebellum life, and neither did I. They were buying a comic book. Many people have a grievance against the very notion of comic books, but I don’t. I understand that comic books as a medium are limited in what they offer their clientele. So are the movies, especially those who cruise the multiplexes for loose coin. Expect a movie or a comic book to explain everything about anything and all you earn is surplus sadness in your life that you don’t really need.

Even with the narrowest expectations about historical veracity, however, things get complicated when the subject matter is American slavery, European Holocaust or any number of similar assaults upon humanity. Hence the reaction to Django, after less than a month of swimming in the mainstream, ranges from sheer exhilaration to outright hostility, with the usual gradations in between.

Much of the resentment seems aimed exclusively towards Tarantino himself; a visceral dislike which I think has a lot to do with Spike Lee’s outright refusal to see the movie, tossing grenades at it all the way. Ishmael Reed, writing in the Wall Street Journal, believes Tarantino shows willful, if not willed ignorance of history, both American and cinematic. He writes: “To compare this movie to a spaghetti western and a blaxploitation film is an insult to both genres. It’s a Tarantino home movie with all the racist licks of his other movies.” Reed aimed this laser shot at the Oscar-nominated actor who plays the treacherous “house slave”: “Samuel L. Jackson…plays himself.”

I doubt Jackson felt the blow. He has, in fact, further provoked the movie’s antagonists by running straight at an interviewer asking about the movie’s prolific use of the “N-word,” refusing to answer the question unless the reporter, who is white, actually says the dread epithet aloud. (He didn’t.)

Though I disagree with Reed’s conclusions, I think everyone who saw Django should read his piece for its flying shrapnel of loose insight and, most important, its disclosure of what has always been a relevant source of disquiet: The debate over whether white artists have the right to tell any part of the black American story – which, as Reed writes, is as old as Uncle Tom’s Cabin.

It is also as recent as 1967 when the white southern novelist William Styron published The Confessions of Nat Turner, a Pulitzer Prize-winning novel told in the first-person voice of the brilliant-but-doomed leader of an 1838 slave rebellion. The outcry from African American novelists was so intense that a collection of essays, William Styron’s Nat Turner: Ten Black Writers Respond was published a year later. When I was a credulous, anxious-to-please teenager, I was so in thrall to the authority exerted by those black writers that for decades afterwards, I refused to even go near Styron’s book.

I still haven’t read it. But I plan to, because I now believe that James Baldwin, a friend of Styron who was one of the few African American authors speaking out on the book’s behalf, had the right take from the beginning: “I will not tell another writer what to write. If you don’t like their alternative, write yours.”

It’s still sound advice – and in the intervening years, black authors have taken it. Indeed, if anyone’s earned the right to rail at Django, it’s Ishmael Reed since, unlike Spike Lee, he’s actually created his own antebellum thriller that’s as funny, provocative and calculatedly anachronistic as Tarantino’s. I can almost hear Reed erupting with outrage over the sheer notion of my comparing Django with his 1976 book, Flight to Canada. But as I insisted to friends and fellow readers at the time (and continue to do so), even with all its musical-comedy interludes, burlesque elements and television cameras, Reed’s shrewd take on the slave-narrative genre had more trenchant, telling and useful things to say about the Peculiar Institution than Alex Haley’s Roots, which was ascending, that same year, to a pop-cultural phenomenon. When Haley’s book became a television mini-series, it affected America’s racial attitudes as nothing of its literary kind since…Uncle Tom’s Cabin. No one’s bothered to do anything with Flight to Canada. Or, for that matter, Charles Johnson’s Oxherding Tale and Middle Passage, two other antebellum satiric adventures written by an award-winning black author.

In 1987, there was Toni Morrison’s Beloved, which did get adapted for the big screen eleven years later by Jonathan Demme. But even with Oprah Winfrey’s imprimatur as producer and co-star, the movie earned about $26,000,000, roughly half of its $50,000,000 budget. And while all I have is anecdotal evidence, I remember many of my African American relatives and friends who told me they were not going to see Beloved, no matte how good it was or who was in it, because they simply did not want to watch a movie about slavery, or its legacy.

This reluctance to engage with the subject of slavery is duly noted in Jelani Cobb’s ruminative take on Django:

“In my sixteen years of teaching African-American history, one sadly common theme has been the number of black students who shy away from courses dealing with slavery out of shame that slaves never fought back. It seems almost pedantic to point out that slavery was nothing like this. The slaveholding class existed in a state of constant paranoia about slave rebellions, escapes, and a litany of more subtle attempts to undermine the institution. Nearly two hundred thousand black men, most of them former slaves, enlisted in the Union Army in order to accomplish en masse precisely what Django attempts to do alone: risk death in order to free those whom they loved. Tarantino’s attempt to craft a hero who stands apart from the other men—black and white—of his time is not a riff on history, it’s a riff on the mythology we’ve mistaken for history. Were the film aware of that distinction, Django would be far less troubling—but it would also be far less resonant. The alternate history is found not in the story of vengeful ex-slave but in the idea that he could be the only one.”

Cobb’s ambivalence approaches my own point-of-view, even though I still liked the movie better than he did. As with other critics, he laments Django’s lapse into revenge-movie mode. I lament the fact that almost EVERY big-studio film is built for revenge, even romantic comedies. (What, after all, is Skyfall but the mother-of-all-revenge-fantasies with different agendas for vengeance overlapping and colliding into each other like a freeway pile-up?) No matter. If Django Unchained did nothing else but arouse re-examination of “the mythology we’ve mistaken for history,” then all the trouble and fuss it’s caused will have been worth it.
EYE ON THE ARTS, NY -- Gene Seymour

Wearing white eyeglasses that clip and unclip above the nose, supervising doctor -- Dr. Waylans (Rob Morrow) --remains even keeled even as his charges race through rampant emotions over patients and personal connections. Most of the sedate action unfolds inside the antiseptic hospital walls; with side trips to Dr. Blake’s equally spare apartment and his female patient’s middle class house.

Directed by Lance Daly, intense, brooding close-ups peer into Dr. Blake’s face and muddled psyche. After developing a crush on one of his patients, Dr. Blake’s murderous side predictably upends the Hippocratic oath to do “no harm.”
Available to Home Market. EYE ON THE ARTS, NY -- Celia Ipiotis